President Trump Orders Pull-Back on ACA

ACA changesBy Brad Roehrenbeck, General Counsel & VP, Legal Services, Compliance

As widely reported over the weekend, within a few hours of his swearing in, President Donald Trump signed his first Executive Order, calling on federal agencies to take immediate steps to curtail aspects of the Affordable Care Act and signaling the new administration’s plans to repeal and replace the Act altogether.

What does the Order say?

The Order itself has little if any tangible impact on the law. The Order states the administration’s official policy of pursuing a complete repeal and replacement of the ACA. It directs the heads of all federal agencies to take steps within their authority to remove or minimize any provision of the ACA that carries fiscal or regulatory burden. As the primary agencies charged with implementing the ACA, that action will likely come from the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Labor, and the IRS. The order also directs these agencies to afford greater flexibility to the States in areas impacted by the law. Finally, the order directs federal agencies to take steps to encourage and enable an interstate market for health coverage.

What does the Order mean for employers?

For now, the Order has no real impact on employers, except to signal that federal agencies will be acting quickly to relax various components of the ACA that impact employers, group health plans, and their members. The Senate has yet to confirm those President Trump has nominated to lead the agencies affected by the Order. Once those agency heads are confirmed, we expect to see regulations issued as prescribed by the Order and will be watching closely. Of course, both the Trump administration and members of both houses are said to be working on legislation to repeal and/or replace the ACA. Both the House and the Senate have laid the groundwork for streamlined procedures for repeal of the Act. They face more of an uphill battle to pass legislation to replace the ACA, as a 60-vote majority will be required in the Senate to pass replacement legislation. We will provide updates as details of those efforts become public. Until such legislation passes or further regulations are released, employers should bear in mind that the ACA remains in full force and effect.MedCost

Judge Issues National Injunction Against Certain ACA Rule 1557 Provisions

michael-berwanger-109-by-192By Michael Berwanger, JD, Director, Quality Management & Compliance

On December 31, 2016, Judge Reed O’Connor of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas entered a nationwide injunction in Franciscan Alliance v. Burwell. The order prohibited the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from enforcing certain provisions of its nondiscrimination rule promulgated under ACA section 1557, namely those that prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or termination of pregnancy.

The remaining provisions of the rule—prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disability, race, color, age, national origin, or sex other than gender identity—are in effect as scheduled, mostly beginning January 1, 2017.

MedCost published a summary of Section 1557 here. HHS has published a summary here and FAQs here. Section 1557 applies antidiscrimination laws to entities receiving assistance under certain federal agencies. These rules have required various plan changes from self-funded plans to implement the protections afforded under the rules.

ACA rule 1557In the December 31 ruling, Judge O’Connor stated that “[w]hile this lawsuit involves many issues of great importance—state sovereignty, expanded healthcare coverage, anti-discrimination protections, and medical judgment—ultimately, the question before the Court is whether Defendants exceeded their authority under the ACA in the challenged regulations’ interpretation of sex discrimination and whether the regulation violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act as applied to Private Plaintiffs.”

Finding that HHS exceeded its authority under the ACA, he enjoined the agency from enforcing the provisions of Section 1557 regarding plan changes for nondiscrimination on the basis of gender identity and pregnancy termination until further judicial or legislative action.

For more information about Section 1557, consult your broker, legal advisor or the Department of Health and Human Services.MedCost

This blog post should not be considered as legal advice.

ACA Reporting Due Early 2017

ACA DeadlinesBy Michael Berwanger, JD, Director, Quality Management & Compliance

In early 2017, employers and insurance carriers must report information to employees and the IRS about coverage offered to employees under employer-sponsored health plans during calendar year 2016.

Background

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires self-funded employers to satisfy two reporting obligations under Sections 6055 and 6056 of the Internal Revenue Code, relating to health coverage offered to employees and about those employees who are covered under the plan.

The purpose of the reporting obligations is to allow the IRS access to data needed to monitor compliance with both the employer and individual mandates. The reporting also may be used by affected employees in assessing their own compliance with the individual mandate and/or in seeking subsidized coverage on the federal and state exchanges established under the ACA (as described in this blog post).

Section 60ACA reporting55 Reporting Compliance

Under Section 6055 of the Internal Revenue Code, all self-funded employers must annually report information to the IRS and to any individual who is covered under a health plan offered by the employer.

Currently, many employers do not have access to Social Security numbers for non-employed dependents, creating a fairly significant compliance burden to collect that data. The regulations require that employers exercise “reasonable collection efforts” to obtain that information. (Typically, an employer will satisfy that standard by documenting at least two efforts to request the data from those individuals). This same information must be reported to employees, along with basic contact information for the employer.

Section 6056 Reporting Compliance

The second reporting obligation, under Code Section 6056, applies only to “Applicable Large Employers.” Applicable Large Employers are those employers with at least 50 full-time equivalent employees and to whom the ACA’s employer mandate applies.

Unlike Section 6055 reporting, all of this information also must be provided separately to each employee, full-time, part-time, or otherwise. You can read helpful IRS guidance about 6056 reporting here.

IRS Forms 1094 and 1095

The compliance obligations are complex, and the IRS has developed forms (Forms 1094-B, 1095-B, 1094-C, and 1095-C) to provide consistency in reporting and to help simplify the process for employers.

Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) who offer coverage under a self-funded health plan may use Form 1095-C, which combines the reporting obligations of Sections 6055 and 6056 in a single form for reporting to both the IRS and individuals. When the forms are provided to the IRS, the Applicable Large Employer also must submit a transmittal form, Form 1094-C. Forms 1095-C and 1094-C, along with instructions, can be accessed here.

Small employers with fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees are only required to meet one of the reporting obligations, the Minimum Essential Coverage reporting under Section 6055. Small employers may use Form 1095-B, with transmittal Form 1094-B. These forms, along with instructions, can be accessed onACA reporting the IRS web site here.

Changes from reporting year 2015 to 2016 for forms 1094-C and 1095-C can be found here.

Changes from reporting year 2015 to 2016 for forms 1094-B and 1095-B can be found here.

Compliance Deadline

Filings will begin in early 2017 for the 2016 calendar year.

*Form 1095-C must be provided to all employees (full-time, part-time, or otherwise) by March 2, 2017.

*All Forms 1095-C, along with the transmittal form, 1094-C, must be provided to the IRS by February 28, 2017 (if in paper form), or March 31, 2017 (if filed electronically). 

Note: Employers filing more than 250 information returns (Form 1095-C) must do so electronically.MedCost

To print this article, click on the title and scroll to “PRINT THIS PAGE” at the bottom.

2016 ACA Employer Deadlines Extended

2016 ACA Employer Deadlines

By Michael Berwanger, JD, Director, Quality Management & Compliance

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released Notice 2016-70, which extends the due date for furnishing to individuals the 2016 Form 1095-B (titled Health Coverage), and the 2016 Form 1095-C (titled Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage), from January 31, 2017 to March 2, 2017.

Self-funded employers should note that the filing deadlines remain unchanged. The Notice states that the “Treasury and the [Internal Revenue] Service have determined that there is no similar need for additional time for employers, insurers, and other providers of minimum essential coverage to file with the Service the 2016 Forms 1094-B, 1095-B, 1094-C, and 1095-C.”

Employer Deadlines

Therefore, the due dates for filing 2016 Forms 1094-B, 1095-B, 1094-C, and 1095-C with the IRS remain:

February 28, 2017 (for paper filing)

March 31, 2017 (for e-filing)

Employers may obtain a 30-day extension for filing with the IRS by filing Form 8809 on or before the forms’ due date.

The IRS has also extended last year’s good-faith transition relief for inaccurate information on the forms. Recognizing the “challenges involved in developing new procedures and systems to accurately collect and report information in compliance with new reporting requirements,” the IRS has provided relief to incorrect and incomplete information reported on the statement or return.

Please note: The good-faith relief applies only to data on the forms, not failure to comply with due dates.MedCost

 

Some ACA Insurance Markets in Turmoil

NC and SC Could Be Two of the Most Affected States

ACA insuranceSome of the Affordable Care Act’s insurance marketplaces are in turmoil as the fourth open enrollment season approaches this fall, but what’s ahead for consumers very much depends on where they live.

Competition on these exchanges will be diminished next year when three of the nation’s largest health insurers — Aetna, United Healthcare and Humana — will sell individual plans in many fewer markets. So too will several Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans in various states. That’s on top of the 16 nonprofit co-ops that have closed since January 2015.

The announcements, however, apply generally only to the individual market. The much larger market of employer-sponsored insurance is not part of the health law exchanges.

Most hurt will be marketplace consumers in Arizona, North and South Carolina, Georgia and parts of Florida, where only one or two insurers will be left when open enrollment season begins Nov. 1.

(Kaiser Health News, Phil Galewitz, August 18, 2016)
KHN

It’s Time to Plan ACA Reinsurance Payments

By Michael Berwanger, JD, Director, Quality Management & Compliance

 

shutterstock_68891791It is time for employer-sponsored health plans to begin thinking about the process for calculation and submission of enrollment data and payment of fees under the Transitional Reinsurance Program.

As background, this program was established to fund a reinsurance pool to help stabilize premiums in the insurance markets created under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

The program is being funded by three annual assessments on employer-sponsored health plans. The assessments are for average covered lives in 2014, 2015 and 2016 calendar years.

This year, enrollment data must be submitted by November 15, 2016, and payment must be submitted no later than January 17, 2017.

The 2016 Reinsurance Contribution Rate is $27.00 per covered life.

Online Submission Process

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has implemented a streamlined process for reinsurancethe collection of reinsurance contributions. A contributing entity, or a Third Party Administrator (TPA) on its behalf, can complete all required steps for the reinsurance contributions process online (using the government portal, pay.gov), including registration, submission of annual enrollment count, and remittance of contributions.

A form is available for the contributing entity (or its TPA) to provide basic company and contact information and the annual enrollment count for the applicable year. The form will automatically calculate the contribution amounts, and entities will be required to submit payment information and schedule a payment date for remittance of the contributions.

CMS will not send an invoice to contributing entities. All required action will be completed online at pay.gov.

Options for Payment

There are two options for how a contributing entity can make a payment: (1) a one-time lump sum payment, or (2) a full contribution in two payments. (See chart below.)

Contribution Payment Options for the 2016 Benefit Year

Reinsurance

Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

CMS will permit contributing entities to submit each year’s contribution in two separate payments – one larger payment of $21.60 per covered life at the start of the year, and a smaller payment of $5.40 per covered life at the end of the year.

However, when submitting enrollment data, dates must immediately be scheduled for payment of the fees, whether there will be one payment prior to January 17, 2017, or two payments with the later in November 2017.

If You Are Self-funded for a Portion of the Reporting Period

health insurance noticesFor a plan that has moved from a fully insured plan to a self-funded plan during the first nine months of the 2016 calendar year, both plans will be responsible for paying a portion of the fee, using one of the permitted calculation methods.

Since fully-insured plans are not permitted to use the Snapshot Factor Method of calculation, either the Actual Count Method or the Snapshot Method of calculation must be used.

Helpful Resources

This site provides technical assistance and training related to the Marketplace and Premium Stabilization program (which includes the Transitional Reinsurance Program). Webinars are offered that provide entities with information on program and operational guidance, along with live demos of the enrollment count and contributions submission process.

This is the site where the contributing entity, or TPA, will create a profile, and submit the enrollment data and contributions for the Transitional Reinsurance Program.

This website is hosted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid to provide information about the Transitional Reinsurance Program.

For more information, consult your broker, legal advisor or cms.gov. MedCost

This blog post should not be considered as legal advice.

 

To print this article, click on the title and scroll to “PRINT THIS PAGE” at the bottom.

Is Your Health Plan Affected by the Cadillac Tax?

One-Fourth of Employers Now Offering CDHPs to Avoid Tax

Employers continue to take action to avoid the looming excise or “Cadillac” tax on more expensive health insurance for their employees. This Affordable Care Act tax of 40% annually is currently set to take effect in 2020, but it is already having a major impact.

A 2015 Mercer study found that total health benefits cost averaged $11,635 per employee.[i] Cadillac taxThis average amount exceeds the Cadillac tax’s threshold of $10,200 for individuals, and would trigger the 40% tax on benefits above the threshold. And small employers are seeing higher increases in medical, dental and other health benefits than large employers.

Employers Turn to
Consumer Plans                                             

For the first time, 25% of covered employees are now enrolled in Consumer-Driven Health Plans (CDHP). Large employers of 20,000 or more employees have added CDHPs the fastest (73%). A projected 34% of employers with 50+ employees will be subject to the excise tax in 2020 if they make no changes to their current health plans.

 Cadillac tax

 

High-Deductible Health Plans (HDHP) are a type of Consumer-Driven Health Plans. Employers are saving an average of 18% with an HSA-eligible HDHP instead of a traditional Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) plan.[ii]

One key reason that employees are researching medical costs in advance for services such as maternity care, joint replacements and Emergency Room visits. A 2015 Consumer Health Insights’ survey showed that 22% always talked to others about costs or searched websites for information.[iii]

Employees who have a telemedicine option in their health plans can choose a more appropriate level of Cadillac taxcare for certain respiratory infections, fevers and nausea (see “Treatment Alternatives to the Emergency Room”). Choosing the right level of care reduces time away from work, boosting productivity. And employees save unnecessary dollars from their own pockets.

Some employers offer pricing transparency tools such as HealtheReports™ which compares costs for a complete procedure. Employees can review local facilities that offer mammograms, colonoscopies, X-rays and other services. HealtheReports also lists comments from members about their recommendations for health care organizations.

A New Era in Health Care

CDHP plans require a shift in thinking about medical spending. In traditional plans, employees are used to handing over their insurance card and paying a small copay.

PiggyBankIt can come as a jolt to employees to realize that CDHP coverage begins with paying expenses up to a higher deductible before insurance kicks in. For this reason, employers must proactively educate employees when introducing CDHP options.

Our next blog will detail key steps for employers to take in providing tools for smart decision-making. Employers who can manage staff expectations with a balanced understanding of the changing health care industry will build a productive partnership with your team.MedCost

 

[i] “With the Excise Tax in Their Sights, Employers Hold Health Benefits Cost Growth to 3.8% in 2015,” Mercer Global, November 19, 2015, http://www.mercer.com/newsroom/national-survey-of-employer-sponsored-health-plans-2015.html (accessed August 8, 2016)

[ii] Ibid.

[iii] “Debunking Common Myths about Healthcare Consumerism,” McKinsey & Company, December 2015, http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/debunking-common-myths-about-healthcare-consumerism (accessed August 11, 2016)

HHS Nondiscrimination Rule: FAQs

By Michael Berwanger, JD, Director, Quality Management & Compliance

medicalOn May 18, 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a final rule (the “Rule”) to implement Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which prohibits discrimination in health coverage and care based on race, color, national origin, age, disability, and sex.

Notably, the Rule:

  • Extends protections against sex discrimination to health coverage and care for the first time, including gender identity discrimination within the definition of sex discrimination;
  •  Implements guidance regarding meaningful access for individuals with Limited English Proficiency, including the provision of free, accurate, and timely language assistance services;
  •  Incorporates existing law that requires reasonable modifications, effective communication, and readily accessible buildings and information technology to avoid disability-based discrimination; and
  •   Prohibits discriminatory health insurance benefit designs and includes specific coverage protections for transgender individuals.

ACA, health insurance, health exchangesHHS has published a useful FAQ here summarizing some of the key aspects of Section 1557. The following Q&A helps explain who the Rule applies to, how the Rule protects against discrimination, and how the Rule impacts coverage offered by self-funded health plans.

I. Who does the Rule apply to?

The Rule applies to (i) every health program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance from HHS; (ii) health programs administered by HHS, and (iii) federally-facilitated and state-based marketplaces established under the Affordable Care Act.

Some examples of types of entities that are subject to the Rule include but are not limited to: physician practices, hospitals, health clinics, health insurance programs, state Medicaid agencies, community health centers, home health care agencies, the Health Insurance Marketplaces, or employers offering employee health benefit programs (in certain circumstances).

How does this impact religious organizations?

The Rule does not include a blanket religious exemption related to Section 1557’s general prohibition against sex discrimination. However, HHS stated that “[e]xisting laws protecting religious freedom and belief, including provider conscience laws, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the ACA’s provisions regarding abortion services, and the ACA’s preventive health services regulations, continue to apply.”

It may be prudent to consult with your legal counsel if you think your organization may qualify for a religious exemption.

EEOC, employer wellness program, wellness program, ACA, GINA
II. When does this take effect for a health plan?

Provisions of the Rule that require changes in plan benefit design take effect in the first plan year on or after January 1, 2017.

III. What does the Rule prohibit?

Under Section 1557, covered entities may not take the following actions on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability:

  • Deny, cancel, limit, or refuse to issue or renew a health insurance policy;
  • Deny or limit coverage of a health insurance claim;
  • Impose additional cost sharing or other limitations or restrictions on coverage; or
  • Use discriminatory marketing practices or insurance benefit designs.

The Rule maintains that while health plans cannot have coverage policies that operate in a discriminatory manner, they still may apply medical necessity rules when determining covered benefits.

HHS clarified that they do not affirmatively require covered entities to cover any particular treatment, as long as the basis for exclusion is evidence based and nondiscriminatory.

What about gender transition services? Are health plans required to cover those services?

If a company is a covered entity under the Rule, not subject to an exception such as the religious exemptions, and the gender transition service is determined to be medically necessary, then it is likely that the service must be covered by the plan. Note that HHS declined to specifically require a gender transition provision.

However, covered entity plans are prevented from discriminating in the provision of benefits based on employer benefit planssex. As such, services such as transition-related services may be subject to medical necessity requirements, but the process for determining medical necessity must also be nondiscriminatory.

For example, HHS stated “[t]he range of transition-related services, which includes treatment for gender dysphoria, is not limited to surgical treatments and may include, but is not limited to, services such as hormone therapy and psychotherapy, which may occur over the lifetime of the individual. We believe the flexibility of the general language in the final rule best serves transgender individuals and covered entities.”

Note that, as mentioned above, the Rule does not affirmatively require covered entities to cover any particular procedure or treatment for transition-related care. The Rule also does not preclude a covered entity from applying neutral standards that govern the circumstances in which it will offer coverage to all its enrollees in a nondiscriminatory manner.

IV. What changes happened regarding sex discrimination?

Section 1557 and HHS’s final regulations, for the first time, extend protections against discrimination based on sex to health coverage and care. Now, covered entities must provide individuals equal accesspregnancy, pregnancies, high risk pregnancy to health programs and activities without discrimination based on sex, including but not limited to pregnancy, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, recovery from childbirth or related medical conditions.

Significantly, HHS extended the term “gender identity” to include gender expression, non-binary gender identities, and transgender status.

V. How will this impact the coverage offered under a Plan?

The Rule does not affirmatively require covered entities to cover any particular procedure or treatment for transition-related care. However, the Rule includes specific protections for transgender individuals and prohibits discriminatory practices. Specifically, HHS stated that “we do not affirmatively require covered entities to cover any particular treatment, as long as the basis for exclusion is evidence based and nondiscriminatory.”

DoctorNote that HHS specified a limited exception to the requirement that covered entities treat individuals consistent with their gender identity: that a covered entity may not deny or limit health services that are ordinarily or exclusively available to individuals of one sex or gender based on the fact that the individual’s sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender in a medical or health insurance plan record differs from the one to which such health services are ordinarily or exclusively available. HHS provided the following example:

“[A] covered entity may not deny an individual treatment for ovarian cancer where the individual could benefit medically from the treatment, based on the individual’s identification as a transgender male. HHS notes that blanket exclusions of all gender transition services, which historically have been used by some Medicaid programs and health insurers, are now recognized as outdated and not based on current standards of care.”

VI. When must covered entities post a notice regarding their non-discrimination policies?

Covered entities must post a notice by October 16, 2016, containing certain elements as required by HHS, as described at 45 CFR 92.8. Notices must be available to beneficiaries, enrollees, applicants, and members of the public. They must be printed in a conspicuously visible font and included in significant communications (such as handbooks and outreach publications), in conspicuous physical locations where the entity interacts with the public, and in a conspicuous location on the covered entity’s website accessible from the homepage. HHS has published a sample notice and nondiscrimination statement.

VII. Will covered entities need to implement a grievance procedure specificemployee benefit plans to Section 1557, and if so, are there special considerations or guidelines?

        Covered entities that employ at least 15 people must adopt a grievance procedure that incorporates appropriate due process standards and provides prompt and equitable resolution of grievances under Section 1557.

HHS and covered entities with more than 15 employees also must designate at least one employee to coordinate the entity’s efforts to carry out Section 1557 responsibilities, including the investigation of grievances. The Rule includes a sample grievance procedure.To ensure compliance with Section 1557, HHS will provide covered entities with a training curriculum on key provisions of the rule.

For more information about Section 1557, consult your broker, legal advisor or the Department of Health and Human Services.MedCost 

 

This blog post should not be considered as legal advice.

Health Costs Up 6% for Big Employers in 2017

Big employers expect health costs to continue rising by about 6 percent in 2017, a moderate increase compared with historical trends that nevertheless far outpaces growth in the economy, two new surveys show.

These cost increases, while stable, are both unsustainable and unacceptable,” said Brian Marcotte, CEO of the National Business Group on Health (NBGH), a coalition of very large employers that got responses from 133 companies.

Employers are changing tactics to address the trend, slowing the shift to worker cost sharing and instead offering video or telephone links to doctors, scrutinizing specialty-drug costs and steering patients to hospitals with records of lower costs and better results.

Most large-company employees should expect a 5 percent increase in their premiums next year and, in contrast to previous years, “minimal changes” to plan designs, NBGH said.

(Kaiser Health NewsJay Hancock, August 9, 2016)
Kaiser Health News

DOL Increases Employee Benefit Plan Penalties

By Michael Berwanger, JD, Director, Quality Management & Compliance

employee benefit plansOn June 30, the Department of Labor (DOL) announced two interim final rules that increase civil penalties for various violations as required by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015.

The Act requires agencies to: 1) adjust the level of civil monetary penalties with an initial “catch-up” adjustment; and (2) make subsequent annual adjustments for inflation. According to the DOL, future adjustments will be made by January 15 of each year, starting in 2017. Here are some highlights of the changes:

*Form 5500The maximum penalty for failing to file Form 5500, which must be filed by most Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plans, will increase from $1,100 to $2,063 per day that the Form 5500 is late.

*Group Health Plans. The maximum penalty for failing to provide the summary of benefits and coverage (SBC) required under health care reform will increase from $1,000 to $1,087 per failure. Violations of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), such as establishing eligibility rules based on genetic information or requesting genetic information for underwriting purposes, may result in penalties of $110 per participant per day, up from $100. Maximum penalties relating to disclosures regarding the availability of Medicaid or Children’s Health Insurance Plan assistance, including failure to disclose to a state, on request, relevant information about the employer’s plan, will also increase from $100 to $110 per day.

*401(k) Plans. For plans with automatic contribution arrangements, penalties for failure to provide the employee benefit plansrequired ERISA § 514(e) preemption notice to participants will increase from $1,000 to $1,632 per day. Penalties for failing to provide blackout notices (required in advance of certain periods during which participants may not change their investments or take loans or distributions) or notices of diversification rights will increase from $100 to $131 per day. And the maximum penalty for failure to comply with the ERISA § 209(b) recordkeeping and reporting requirements will increase from $11 to $28 per employee.

*Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements (MEWAs)Penalties for failure to meet applicable filing requirements, which include annual Form M-1 filings and filings upon origination, will increase from $1,100 to $1,502 per day.

Other penalties increased by the regulations include those for failure to provide certain information requested by the DOL, failures not corrected within specified time periods, and defined benefit plan compliance failures. The increases apply to penalties assessed after August 1, 2016, with respect to violations occurring after November 2, 2015.

employee benefit plansPenalty assessments made before August 1, 2016, (including those relating to violations after November 2, 2015) and assessments at any time relating to violations on or before November 2, 2015, will reflect the lower pre-adjustment amounts.

You can read the DOL FAQ here and see a full listing of new penalty amounts here.

 

To print this article, click on the title and scroll to “PRINT THIS PAGE” at the bottom.